<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flash SEO&#187; MSN Archives  &#8211; Flash SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashseo.com/category/search/msn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashseo.com</link>
	<description>How to optimise Flash for search engines.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No Flash indexing for smaller search engines?</title>
		<link>http://www.flashseo.com/seo/flash-indexing-smaller-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flashseo.com/seo/flash-indexing-smaller-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StalkerB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashseo.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amidst all this talk of what Google is doing with Flash and even Yahoo getting a mention in Adobe's release what about the smaller search engines? Will they be left behind?


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amidst all this talk of what Google is doing with Flash and even Yahoo getting a mention in Adobe&#8217;s release what about the smaller search engines? Will they be left behind?</p>
<p>MSN Search and Ask accounted for 9.5% of U.S. and 7% of U.K. traffic searches in June 2008 (<a title="Hitwise" href="http://www.hitwise.com" target="_blank">source Hitwise</a>). Ignoring the fact that Google and Yahoo still aren&#8217;t indexing Flash sites perfectly, do you really want to exclude that sort of percentage of your possible audience?</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flashseo.com/seo/flash-indexing-smaller-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
